N.Veerammal v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty First day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.875 of 2015 N.VEERAMMAL ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE F1 SUBRAMANIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CR. NO.81/2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.PANDIARAJAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 341, 506(i) I.P.C. and Section 4 TNWH Act in Crime No.81 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. It is seen that there was a dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant with regard to parking of car.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) submitted that A.1 and A.3 have already been arrested in this case.

5. Considering the fact and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Madurai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 21/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.IV, MADURAI 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE F1 SUBRAMANIYAPURAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.B.PANDIARAJAN Advocate SR.No.3060

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.875 of 2015 Date :21/01/2015 NA/23/01/2015/P2/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/