Raj @ Raj Narayanan v. State Rep.By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twentieth day of July Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.12170 of 2016 RAJ @ RAJ NARAYANAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.4 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE KURUMBUR POLICE STATION THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.106 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S A.D.GANESHAMOORTHI Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 147,148,448,323, 506(ii) of IPC r/w. Section 4 of Women Harassment act and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.106 of 2016, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and caused damage worth Rs.10,000/-. On complaint, a case has been registered against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is willing to deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/- and prays for granting anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the damage caused is worth Rs.10,000/- and the investigation of the case is pending.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/-, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District and on condition that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) to the credit of above said Crime No.106 of 2016 and execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am until further orders.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 20/07/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SRIVAIKUNDAM,TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

2 DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KURUMBUR POLICE STATION THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S A.D.GANESHAMOORTHI Advocate SR.No.38012

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12170 of 2016 Date :20/07/2016 PA/NGM-MP/SAR III/21.07.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/