R. Pandi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Second day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.12231 of 2016 1 R. PANDI 2 P. VANI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Rank Not Known Vs THE STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMBATHURAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S D.VENKATESH Advocate For Respondent :MR.P.KANNITHEVAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : MR.V.KARUNA, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2 The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) submitted that based on the complaint given by the de facto complaint, the respondent Police has conducted enquiry and the same has been closed.

3 Recording the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side), the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 02/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMBATHURAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No.50112 +1 cc to Mr.V.KARUNA,Advocate, Sr.No: 49558 JAM/SKS-RR/7.09.16/SAR III /2p-5c

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12231 of 2016 Date :02/09/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/