Veerappan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixth day of May Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.8903 of 2015 1 VEERAPPAN 2 PATTU 3 PAPATHI 4 PALANIYAPPAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1,6,7 & 8 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOGAMALAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DIST.
CRIME NO. 150/2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294 (b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.150 of 2015, seek anticipatory bail.
2. It is represented that co-accused had been arrested and released on bail and there is no previous case as against the petitioners. It is further represented that on account of money transactions, the dispute had arisen. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but with conditions.
3. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Kulithalai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioners 1 and 4 shall report before the respondent police everyday at 6.30 p.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners 2 and 3 shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[e] The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) as to whether these petitioners are complying with the condition or not.
sd/- 06/05/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KUZHITHALAI. 2.
-DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOGAMALAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.V.KANNAN Advocate SR.No. 25060 SR/SJW : 07.05.2015 : 2P/6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.8903 of 2015 Date :06/05/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/