Seetharaman v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.8937 of 2015 1 SEETHARAMAN 2 KEESEGAN 3 PARAMASIVAM ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.R.DURAI RAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 498(A) I.P.C and Section 4 of Women Harrassment Act in Crime No.not known of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard both sides.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, enquiry was conducted and thereafter the same was closed. 4.In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this criminal original petition is dismissed. sd/- 04/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO

1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

2. THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

SR/PS : 09.06.2015 : 1P/3C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8937 of 2015 Date :04/06/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/