Latha, W/O. Ravi, v. State Rep. By Sub Inspector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixth day of May Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.8971 of 2015 LATHA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No. 2 Vs STATE REP. BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTUPUTHUR POLICE STATION, KATTUPUTHUR, TRICHY DIST.

(CR.NO.130/2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.VADIVELAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.130 of 2015, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that there are totally two accused and this petitioner is arrayed as A2. It is also represented that they attacked the defacto complainant by using wooden log and knife and the injured had been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case as against the petitioner. It is also represented that the first accused had already been arrested and released on bail. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, but with conditions.

3. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Musiri on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

[a] the petitioner being a lady shall report before respondent Police Station as and when required for interrogation. [b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [e] The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) as to whether the petitioner is complying with the condition or not.

sd/- 06/05/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,MUSIRI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TRICHY 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTUPUTHUR POLICE STATION, KATTUPUTHUR, TRICHY 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.T.VADIVELAN Advocate SR.No.25114

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8971 of 2015 Date :06/05/2015 AA/07.05.2015/2p- 6c/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/