← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/5499/2022ordered

Arun Muthukumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-03-29Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 29/03/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR Arun Muthukumar, ... Petitioner/Accused No.9 Vs THE STATE REP BY, The Inspector of Police, Vilakuthoon Police Station, Madurai.

Crime No. 1442 of 2020.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.M.Raja, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 1442 of 2020 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 468, 471 IPC, in Crime No.1442 of 2020, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner/A9 is a known person to one Hariharaputhiran/A1, who was working as a Gold Jewel Appraiser in the Bank of Baroda, Madurai, who colluded with his higher officials/Bank Manager A2 and Bank Staff A3, had misappropriated the gold jewels pledged by the customers in the said Bank and created false documents and accounts in the name of the customers and thereby cheated the Bank. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State would submit that the investigation is pending. He would further submit that the co-accused A1, A5 to A8 and A10 were already released on bail.

1/3

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the facts that the co-accused A1, A5 to A8 and A10 were already released on bail and the remaining accused were already granted anticipatory bail and that the petitioner is not having any bad antecedents, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 29/03/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

DAS Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I MADURAI 2 DO-THROUGH :

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VILAKUTHOON POLICE STATION, MADURAI THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADRUAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5499 of 2022 Date :29/03/2022 PKP/JM/SAR-1/05.04.2022/3P/5C 3/3