Alagarsamy, v. State Rep. By The Inspector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.9040 of 2015 1 ALAGARSAMY, 2 MALLIKA, 3 RAMAKRISHNAN, ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 TO 3 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SAPTUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT.(CR.NO.40/2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT M.K.SURESH ...INTERVENOR For Petitioner : M/S.S.RAMASAMY Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : J.RAMAMOORTHY Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A3 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 420, 341, 294(b), 506(ii) and 109 of IPC, in Crime No.40 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive with regard to money transaction, on 08.03.2015 the accused restrained the defacto complainant and abused him with filthy language and also threatened the de-facto complainant with dire consequences. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

He further submitted that the dispute between the accused and the de-facto complainant was settled amicably before the mediation centre, on 22.06.2015.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent and the learned counsel for the intervener/de-facto complainant.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur and on each of them executing a own bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERAIYUR.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SAPTUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.S.RAMASAMY Advocate SR.No.34930. TS/02.07.2015/2P -6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9040 of 2015 Date :30/06/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/