Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/906/2015dismissed

Royappan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-02-13Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Thirteenth day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.906 of 2015 1 ROYAPPAN 2 PERIYANAYAGI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY DISTRICT, CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.ALAGUMANI Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KANNITHEVAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 406, 420 and 506(i) I.P.C. and Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prize Schemes (Prohibition) Act 1979 in Crime No.Not known of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

3. On 21.01.2015 this Court granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Today, the respondent police has filed the status report in which in paragraph No.6, they have stated that the petitioners have not complied with the order of this Court even one day.

4. The learned Counsel for the petitioners justifies it by submitting that the petitioners appeared before the Inspector of Police, but the Inspector of Police did not meet them and therefore, they have signed the visitor's register in the office of the Superintendent of Police.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.This explanation is not acceptable because interim anticipatory bail has been granted by this Court and if the respondent is not entertaining the petitioners, it is the duty of the petitioners to inform this Court and not sign in the visitor's register in the Office of the Superintendent of Police.

6. Therefore, for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 13/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY DISTRICT RL/3C - 18/2/2015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.906 of 2015 Date :13/02/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/