← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9167/2015ordered

Vannimuthu, S/O. Vanniraj, v. State Rep. By

2015-05-14Honourable Mr Justice G. Chockalingam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourteenth day of May Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL OP(MD) No.9167 of 2015 1 VANNIMUTHU, 2 KATHIRESAN, 3 KANNAMMAL, 4 SANTHANAM, 5 VANNIARAJ, 6 SARASU, 7 SANTHANA SELVAM, 8 KANNIAMMAL, 9 VANNIARAJAN, 10 MUTHUKUMAR, ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.1 to 10 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THARUVAIKULAM POLICE STATION, VILATHIKULAM TALUK, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

CR. NO.98/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.ANANDAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A10, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.98 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners alleged to have attacked and scolded the defacto complainant. 3.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the fourth petitioner herein has lodged a complaint against the defacto complainant and in order to counterblast the same, the present complaint has been foisted against the petitioners. He further submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submits that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the Judicial Magistrate, Vilathikulam and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 14/05/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VILATHIKULAM 2 -DO-THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TUTICORIN DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THARUVAIKULAM POLICE STATION, VILATHIKULAM TALUK, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.N.ANANDAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.25384 Sm:15.05.2015:2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9167 of 2015 Date :14/05/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/