G.Raja @ Sethuraja, v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fifth day of December Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.21513 of 2018 G.RAJA @ SETHURAJA ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No. 2 Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARAMAKUDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.308/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.K.RADHAKRISHNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506 (ii) IPC in Cr.No.308 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the first and second accused have attacked the defacto complainant with bricks and two unknown persons have also attacked the defacto complainant with wooden log, thereby caused injuries to the defacto complainant. 3.The learned Government Advocate would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

4.Taking into consideration the facts of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ten thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that: [a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 05/12/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARAMAKUDI 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARAMAKUDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to MR.K.RADHAKRISHNAN Advocate SR.No.22717

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.21513 of 2018 Date :05/12/2018 MSI/VR-MMS/SAR-II/11.12.2018-2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/