P.R. Jeyabalan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of January Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.1257 of 2016 1 P.R. JEYABALAN 2 P.R. KAMARAJ 3 P.R. CHITHARANJAN 4 J. BALAJI 5 J. ESAIMOZHI 6 C. INDRA 7 K. JEYALAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 TO 7 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAIKKANAL POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

IN CR.NO. 25 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S N.SATHISH BABU Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused in Crime No.25 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 448, 294(b) and 506(II) of IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the tresspassed in the property of the defacto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) submitted that no one sustained injury in this case.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact no one sustained injury, this Court is

inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal, and on their executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 to 4 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m until further orders and the petitioners 5 to 7 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 25/01/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KODAIKANAL. 2 DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL. 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAIKKANAL POLICE STATION,DINDIGUL DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S N.SATHISH BABU Advocate SR.No.4420

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.1257 of 2016 Date :25/01/2016 RG.PM-MP/SAR-II 27/01/2016 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/