Rohini v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty First day of May Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V.S.RAVI CRL OP(MD) No.9252 of 2015 ROHINI ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAILWAY POLICE FORCE, DINDIGUL RAILWAY STATION DINDIGUL CR.NO.46/15 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.HAJA MOHIDEEN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This is an application filed by the petitioner/Sole accused to grant anticipatory bail in Crime No.46 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C.
2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent lady and she has not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.
3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that injured had already been discharged from the hospital.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side).
5. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioner can be granted the relief prayed for with conditions and accordingly;
(a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;
(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul within fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready;
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
(i) The petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on her executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul;
(ii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person appointed with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) The petitioner shall be available for interrogation by the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 21/05/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, DINDIGUL 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAILWAY POLICE FORCE, DINDIGUL RAILWAY STATION DINDIGUL.
4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.A.HAJA MOHIDEEN Advocate SR.No.25956
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.9252 of 2015 Date :21/05/2015 NA/IV/26/05/2015/P2/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/