Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8462/2018disposed of

Vijayagapraj v. The Superintendent Of Police

2018-04-24Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.04.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.(MD)No.8462 of 2018 Vijayagapraj : Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Ettayapuram Police Station, Tuticorin District.

: Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission to perform the programs such as Adal Padal festival on 11.05.2018 at night 07.00 p.m., to 11.00 p.m., at Church by name Punitha Paraloga Matha Kovil, Micheal Andavar Church is situated at Venkatachalapuram, Kovilpatti Union, Ettayapuram Taluk, Tuticorin District and to provide adequate police protection based on my representation dated 14.04.2018. (prayer amended vide Court order dated 24.04.2018 in W.M.P.(MD) No.8360 of 2018) For Petitioner : Mr.S.Bharathi For Respondents : Mr.M.Karuppasamy Government Advocate *****

O R D E R

The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission to perform the programs such as Adal Padal festival on 11.05.2018 at night 07.00 p.m., to 11.00 p.m., at Church by name Punitha Paraloga Matha Kovil, Micheal Andavar Church is situated at Venkatachalapuram, Kovilpatti Union, Ettayapuram Taluk, Tuticorin District and to provide adequate police protection based on my representation dated 14.04.2018.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. According to the petitioner, the petitioner has made a representation to the respondents on 14.04.2018 seeking permission to perform the aforesaid function on 11.05.2018.

4. The learned Government Advocate has stated that the petitioner has made the representation as an individual and also has not furnished particulars and therefore, the said application cannot be considered for granting permission.

5. In the light of the above submission of the learned Government Advocate, the petitioner requests this Court to grant liberty to make a fresh representation to the second respondent.

6. Taking note of the above submissions, the petitioner is at liberty to make a fresh representation to the second respondent through the concerned organiser of the function. If any such representation is made by the petitioner to the respondents, the same shall be considered by the respondents on or before 29.04.2018.

7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Ettayapuram Police Station, Tuticorin District.

+ 1 cc TO Mr.S.Bharathi , Advocate in SR No. 63501 sm AE/SV MMS/SAR1/07.05.2018/2P/4C W.P.(MD)No.8462 of 2018 24.04.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/