← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/1269/2016allowed

T.Arokiya Chellappa v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-01-25Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.01.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1269 of 2016 1.T.Arokiya Chellappa 2.M.Chokkar ... Petitioners/Accused 1 & 2 Vs.

1. The State through The Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai Crime No.878 of 2014 ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Veeranan ... 2nd Respondent / Defacto complainant Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to call for the charge sheet in C.C.No.347 of 2014, on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai and to quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.K.R.Laxman For R1 :

Mrs.S.Prabha Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.347 of 2014, on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai.

2. It is seen that the case in Crime No.878 of 2014 has been registered for the offences under Sections 288 and 337 of IPC against the petitioners / Accused.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the petitioners/Accused and the second respondent/defacto complainant, have appeared in persons and their identifications were also verified by this Court, in addition to the confirmation of the parties by the Government Advocate (Crl.Side) through the respondent Police.

4. The counsel appearing on either side would submit that a Compromise Memo has been filed stating that, since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement by way of compromise among themselves, the second respondent has agreed to withdraw the above case. He would also submit that the matter has already been settled before the Lok https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Adalat on 12.09.2015.

5. Considering the nature of allegations and also considering the Compromise Memo, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served in keeping these matters pending. Therefore, the charge sheet in C.C.No.347 of 2014, on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, in so far as the petitioners are concerned, is hereby quashed.

6. Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petition is allowed on the basis of the compromise entered into between the parties. The joint compromise memo shall form part of this order. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai

2. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai

4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. MPK TE/GSV-AN/ : 16/02/2016 : 2P/5C Encl: Xerox Copy of Joint Compromise Memo.

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1269 of 2016 25.01.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/