Murugan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty First day of May Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V.S.RAVI CRL OP(MD) No.9345 of 2015 MURUGAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.4 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATTANKULAM POLICE STATION THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, CRIME NO. 278 OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.A.EBENEZER Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A4 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.278 of 2014 on the file of the respondent Police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent person and he has not committed any offence and pray for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner. 3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sattankulam, on executing a separate bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police daily for at 05.30 p.m., for two weeks and thereafter as and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 21/05/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SATTANKULAM.

2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI. 3.THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATTANKULAM POLICE STATION,THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S.T.A.EBENEZER Advocate SR.No.25979

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9345 of 2015 Date :21/05/2015 RG.26.05.2015 2P.6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/