Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9385/2015allowed

M.M.Kaja Nazamudeen v. State Rep.By

2015-05-21Honourable Mr Justice V. S. Ravi2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty First day of May Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V.S.RAVI CRL OP(MD) No.9385 of 2015 1 M.M.KAJA NAZAMUDEEN 2 K.MEHARUNNISHA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DINDIGUL TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CR.NO.409 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/SJ.LAWRANCE Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This is an application filed by the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 to grant anticipatory bail in Crime No.409 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 447, 427, 506(i) of I.P.C.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners.

3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that no-one sustained injury in this case.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side).

5. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioners can be granted the relief prayed for with conditions, and accordingly;

(a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;

(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul within fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready;

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

(i) The petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on their executing a separate bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul; (ii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person appointed with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) The petitioners shall be available for interrogation by the respondent police daily at 5.30 p.m. for two weeks and thereafter, as when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 21/05/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III,DINDIGUL.

2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3.THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DINDIGUL TOWN SOUTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.J.LAWRANCE Advocate SR.No.25987

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9385 of 2015 Date :21/05/2015 RG.26.05.2015 2P.6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/