Ramesh v. The State Rep.By Its

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Seventh day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.9389 of 2015 1 RAMESH 2 MARIAPPAN 3 RAMASAMY 4 MARIAPPAN 5 AYYAPPAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SEITHUNGANALLUR POLICE STATION, SEITHUNGANALLUR, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.R.DURAI RAJ Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under section 420 of IPC on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the de-facto complainant, petition enquiry was conducted and closed.

3.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (crl.side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed. sd/- 07/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,SEITHUNGANALLUR POLICE STATION, SEITHUNAGANALLUR,TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

2. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9389 of 2015 Date :07/08/2015 GJM/PRV/SAR-II 13.8.15-1P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/