P.Muthu v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of May Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.9424 of 2015 1 P.MUTHU 2 T.SOLIYAN 3 S.DHEENADAYAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.3 TO 5 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VADAMADURAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
CR. NO. 12/2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.CHANDRA KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are A3 to A5, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.12 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that there is a matrimonial dispute between the de-facto complainant and the first accused. The petitioners are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant and they have demanded dowry from the de-facto complainant.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocents and they were falsely implicated in this case and the co-accused/A1 and A2 were arrested and enlarged on bail.
4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the co-accused were already granted bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Natham and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.
6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 27/05/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NATHAM 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, VADAMADURAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.A.CHANDRA KUMAR Advocate SR.No.26385
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.9424 of 2015 Date :27/05/2015 NA/IV/28/05/2015/P2/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/