E.Ganesh Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of May Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) Nos.9444 and 9456 of 2015 1 E.GANESH KUMAR 2 G.PAUL PANDIAMMAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN IN BOTH THE PETITIONS Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE B4 SIMMAKKAL POLICE STATION, MADURAI, CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.9444/2015 THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING MADURAI (CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.9456/2015 For Petitioner : M/S.R.JEGADEESWARAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) in both the Petitions PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The Petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 420 and 506(i) IPC. They have approached this Court for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit in his argument that no complaint is pending against the petitioners or no case is registered against the petitioners and hence, there is no apprehension of arrest. 3.Recording, the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), these Petitions are dismissed.

sd/- 27/05/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE B4 SIMMAKKAL POLICE STATION, MADURAI, 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING, MADURAI RL/4 C- 1/6/2015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.9444 and 9456 of 2015 Date :27/05/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/