Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/15703/2017closed

R.Ilavenil, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2017-11-23Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Third day of November Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.15703 of 2017 1 R.ILAVENIL, 2 V.RAMASAMY, 3 R.KALAISELVI, ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY ITS, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, FORT POLICE STATION, TIRUCHIRAPALLI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.S.K.MANI Advocate For Respondent : THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 294 (b), 498(A), 354 and 354(A) of IPC., and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.Not Known of 2017, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a family dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant. Hence, the defacto complainant lodged a false complaint against the petitioners before the respondent police.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the State, on instructions, would submit that based on the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and as per the direction of this Court, each and every District have formed a District Level Committee in order to settle the issues related to Section 498(A) of IPC cases. Accordingly, the case was referred to the District Level https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Committee for proper decision. Hence, this anticipatory bail petition is pre-matured one.

5. Recording the statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed as pre-matured. However, if any adverse order passed by the District Level Committee, it is open to the petitioners to work out the remedy in the manner known to law.

sd/- 23/11/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDGE, ADDITIONAL MAHILA COURT, TIRUCHIRAPALLI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, FORT POLICE STATION, TIRUCHIRAPALLI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

MRN GJM/RR/SAR-3-5.12.2017-2P-4C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15703 of 2017 Date :23/11/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/