Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9482/2015closed

Jeyaramachandiran v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-10-20Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twentieth day of October Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.9482 of 2015 1 JEYARAMACHANDIRAN 2 SETHURAJ 3 PANCHAVARNAM 4 RAMARAJAN 5 JEYALATCHUMANAN 6 CHINNA MUTHULATCHUMI 7 PONNI SELVI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPATHUR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.P.VENKATA SUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498(A) IPC., and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No. Not Known of 2015, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the first petitioner and the de-facto complainant got married on 02.11.2014 as per the Hindu Customs and Rights. Due to the misunderstanding in between the first petitioner and the de-facto complainant, she left her matrimonial home and started living her parental home and thereafter the petitioners herein demanded dowry from the defacto complainant.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners states that when the matter is came up before this Court on 27.05.2015, interim order was granted in respect of the first petitioner not to arrest till the Mediation is over. The learned counsel for the petitioners further states that the petitioners are no way connected in this case. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, on instructions, would submit that it is only an petition enquiry, till date FIR is not registered. 5.Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, the harassment of the petitioner does not arise in this case. Recording the said submission, this Criminal Original Petition stands closed with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum, as and when the apprehension is arise.

sd/- 20/10/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUPPATHUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUPPATHUR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9482 of 2015 Date :20/10/2017 SMA/PM-PN/SAR-2/26.10.2017:2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/