M. Somuraja v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of May Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.9511 of 2015 1 M. SOMURAJA 2 C. MARIAPPAN 3 M. SIVANAMMAL 4 M.KALIRAJA 5 C. MUTHSELVI ... PETITIONER/1ST TO 5TH ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SANNKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.C.BASKARAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 506(i), 498(A) IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the first petitioner is the husband of the de facto complainant and the petitioners 2 to 5 are the in-laws of the de facto complainant and the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence.

3.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) submitted that petition enquiry is pending.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioners 2 to 5 are the in-laws of the de facto complainant, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners 2 to 5 on anticipatory bail with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners 2 to 5 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sivagiri and on each executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 2 to 5 shall appear before the respondent police, as and when required, for interrogation. The petitioners 2 to 5 shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

6.As far as the first petitioner is concerned, the matter is referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to this Bench. The Registry is directed to post the matter after getting report from the Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Till then, the first petitioner shall not be arrested by the respondent police. sd/- 27/05/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGIRI 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT 3 THE CHIEF CO-ORDINATOR MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION CENTRE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SANNKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

5 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.C.BASKARAN Advocate SR.No.26365

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9511 of 2015 Date :27/05/2015 NA/AMF/28/05/2015/P2/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/