Paulraj v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Ninth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.9537 of 2015 1 PAULRAJ 2 RAJESH @ RAKESH 3 KARTHEESH 4 SATHEESH 5 BAMA @ ARUMUGADEVI BAMA 6 PAVITHA @ KAVITHA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 TO 6 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MEIGNANAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DIST, CR.NO.120/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.SARAVANAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 6 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 and 506 (ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.120 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the de-facto complainant is the brother of the first petitioner and the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

3. It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

4. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 09/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SATHANKULAM.

2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN. 3.THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADUARAI. 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MEIGNANAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DIST. +1. CC to M/S.M.SARAVANAN Advocate SR.No.29182

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9537 of 2015 Date :09/06/2015 RG.12.06.2015 2P.6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/