S.Muniyasamy v. The Sub-Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Third day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.9627 of 2015 S.MUNIYASAMY ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.6 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE JETTY POLICE STATION, RAMESWARAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

CR. NO.31/2015.

... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.VELAYUTHAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is A6 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 294(B), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.31 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 25.05.2015, while consuming liquor in the TASMAC Bar, there was a wordy altercation between the accused and the de-facto complainant, in which the accused persons attacked the de-facto complainant and also threaten him with dire consequences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rameswaram and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 03/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMESWARAM.

2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM. 3.THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE JETTY POLICE STATION, RAMESWARAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.B.VELAYUTHAM Advocate SR.No.27446

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9627 of 2015 Date :03/06/2015 RG.05.06.2015 2P.6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/