Senthoorpandi v. The Additional Chief Secretary To Government
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.08.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR H.C.P.(MD)No.314 of 2023 Senthoorpandi ... Petitioner / Father of the Detenu Vs.
1.The Additional Chief Secretary to the Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XVI)Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Office of the District Collector and District Magistrate, Thanjavur District.
3.The Superintendent of Prison, Trichy Central Prison, Trichy District.
.. Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the detention order passed by the 2nd respondent in
P.D.No.11/2023, dated 11.02.2023 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body or detenu, namely, Harimurugan, S/o.Senthurpandi, aged about 28 years now detained at Central Prison, Tiruchirappalli before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadikumar Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH,J.) The petitioner is the father of the detenu viz., Harimurugan, S/o.Senthurpandi, aged about 28 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in P.D.No.11/2023, dated 11.02.2023, holding him to be a "Drug Offender", as contemplated under Section 2(e) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition.
2.We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority.
3.Though several grounds have been raised in the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would mainly focus his argument on the ground that the detention order was passed on 11.02.2023 and the grounds of detention ought to have been served within five days, i.e., on or before 15.02.2023. However, it was served on the detenu only on 17.02.2023 and therefore, there is a delay of 7 days in serving the booklet to the detenu. On the said sole ground, he contended that the detention order is liable to be set aside. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has strongly opposed this Habeas Corpus Petition by filing his counter affidavit. 5.Perusal of the record would go to show that no doubt, the detention order was passed on 11.02.2023 and the booklet was served on the detenu only on 17.02.2023, which is evident from the endorsement made as under:
6.As per Section 8 of the Act 14 of 1982, the detaining authority not later than five days from the date of detention, serve the detenu the grounds of detention. As per the said Act, one day should be excluded. In the present case, after excluding the said one day, it is seen that the booklet has been served with a delay of 7 days and hence, the detention order is liable to be quashed.
7.In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in P.D.No.11/2023, dated 11.02.2023 passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu, viz., Harimurugan, S/o.Senthurpandi, aged about 28 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case. (M.S.R.,J.) & (M.N.K.,J.) 07.08.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Yuva
To 1.The Additional Chief Secretary to the Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Joint Secretary to Government, Public Law and Order, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
3.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Office of the District Collector and District Magistrate, Thanjavur District.
4.The Superintendent of Prison, Trichy Central Prison, Trichy District.
5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
M.S.RAMESH, J.
AND M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
Yuva H.C.P.(MD)No.314 of 2023 07.08.2023