Senthilmurugan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Third day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.9651 of 2015 1 SENTHILMURUGAN 2 K.M.GOPAL 3 R.PACKIALAKSHMI 4 A.RAJESHWARI 5 B.NAGA JOTHY 6 S.ANBUSELVI 7 BALAMBAL 8 K.VADIVEL ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MANAPPARAI POLICE STATION, MANAPPARAI, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DIST.

CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015.

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.M.MADASAMY Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A8 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 147, 294(B) and 323 of IPC, in Crime No.398 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to family dispute between the de-facto complainant and the accused, there was a wordy quarrel between them, in which the accused attacked the de-facto complainant and caused simple injury.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that in the alleged occurrence, the injured has sustained only simple injury and after treatment, she has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 03/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAPPARAI, TRICHY. 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANAPPARAI POLICE STATION, MANAPPARAI, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DIST.

+1. CC to M/S.T.M.MADASAMY Advocate SR.No.27818 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9651 of 2015 Date :03/06/2015 PBK/AMF 09/06/2015 ::2P-6C::

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/