Arul Sathiya Selvam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fifteenth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.9721 of 2015 1 ARUL SATHIYA SELVAM 2 SAM DANIEL RAJ 3 PARTHIBAN 4 BHARATH SURESH KUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PAVOOR CHATHIRAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, (CRIME NO.178 OF 2015). ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.PITCHAI MUTHU Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.178 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioners assaulted the de-facto complainant and also threatened him with dire consequences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are an innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that the injured person had discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the second petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation and the petitioners No.1,3 and 4 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitionesr shall comply with the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 15/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TENKASI 2 -DO-THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PAVOOR CHATHIRAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT, 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1cc to Mr.Pitchai muthu, Advocate SR.No.31459 Sm:18.06.2015:1P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9721 of 2015 Date :15/06/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/