Katti Thangam, F/83 v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirteenth day of August Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.9730 of 2015 1 KATTI THANGAM, 2 JEYARANIK 3 SHANTHI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2 to 4 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, (CR.NO.11 OF 2015).

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.DEENADHAYALAN Advocate For Respondent : MS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) FOR INTERVENOR : MR.C.T.PERUMAL, ADVOCATE PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A2 to A4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 498-A, 406 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crim No.11 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with others harassed the de-facto complainant for want of more dowry.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the intervenor.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

8. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 13/08/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM 2 DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9730 of 2015 Date :13/08/2015 JAM/AAL&JGB&LIB/20.8.15/2P-5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/