← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16061/2017dismissed

S.Velu Alias Velautham v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-11-23Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Thursday, the Twenty Third day of November, Two Thousand and Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.16061 of 2017 S.VELU ALIAS VELAUTHAM ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED(RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUMANGALAM TALUK POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 213 OF 2016 AND CRIME NO.243/2016) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT Prayer in CRL OP(MD). 16061/ 2017 :

Criminal Original Petition under section 439(1)(b) of Criminal Procedure Code praying this Hon'ble Court to direct the learned J.M Thirumangalam to accept common blood sureties instead in Crl. M. P No. 1371/2017 in Cr No. 213/2016 order dated on 27.03.2017 and Crl. M. P No. 1841/2017 in Cr No. 243/2016 order dated on 25.04.2017 of solvent sureties on the file of the respondent police. ORDER:

This Petition coming on for hearing on this day, upon perusing the petition, the order of the court below and material papers filed, and upon hearing the argument of Mr.S.MALAIKANI, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Criminal Side), on behalf of the Respondent, this Court made the following Order:

The Petitioner filed this modification petition to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, to accept common blood sureties instead in Crl.M.P.No.1371 of 2017 in Crime No.213 of 2016 order dated 27.03.2017 and Crl.M.P.No.1841 of 2017 in Crime No.243 of 2016 order dated 25.04.2017 of solvent sureties on the file of the respondent police.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.The Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioner initially accepted to to produce four sureties with bond. Accordingly, as per the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the said condition was imposed.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), I am not inclined to modify the condition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thirumangalam Taluk Police Station, Madurai.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to Mr.S.MALAIKANI, Advocate SR.No.34966 JS/JC/SAR.1/13.12.2017/2P-5C ORDER DATED:23.11.2017

ORDER

CRL OP(MD) No.16061 of 2017 GIVING DIRECTION ETC., AS STATED WITHIN.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/