Anantharaj v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Seventh day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.98 of 2015 ANANTHARAJ ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANNA NAGAR POLICE STATION, MADURAI, CRIME NO.1612/2014 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.SANKAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 341, 294(b) and 506(i) IPC r/w Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.1612 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is working as Bus Conductor and the defacto complainant was a passenger in the bus and there appears to be a wordy quarrel between them.

3. Investigation Officer is present before this Court.

4. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that it is a case of case and counter and the counter case has been registered in Crime No.1613 of 2014.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 07/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, MADURAI.

2. -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANNA NAGAR POLICE STATION, MADURAI,

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.SANKAR Advocate SR.No. 1010 SR : 12.01.2015 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.98 of 2015 Date :07/01/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/