Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9812/2015ordered

Savarimuthu v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-06-04Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.9812 of 2015 1 SAVARIMUTHU 2 SUSILA MARY METILDA ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 & 3 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THATTARAMADAM POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DIST.

CR.NO. 91 OF 2015.

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.I.A.K.BAGADURSHA Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as an accused Nos.2 and 3 in Crime No.91 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of I.P.C. And Section 4 of TNPWH Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and pray for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that no one sustained injury.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that no one sustained injury, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam, Tuticorin District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 04/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SATHANKULAM, TUTICORIN DISTRICT. 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THATTARAMADAM POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DIST. +1. CC to M/S.S.I.A.K.BAGADURSHA Advocate SR.No.27469 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.9812 of 2015 Date :04/06/2015 PBK/IV 05/06/2015 ::2P-6C::

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/