Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9824/2015ordered

Kumaresan v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-06-04Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fourth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.9824 of 2015 KUMARESAN ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST.

CRIME NO. 71 OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.THIRUMAL Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is the sole accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) I.P.C. in Crime No.71 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant due to money dispute.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) submitted that in the alleged occurrence, the defacto complainant did not sustain any injury.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai, Dindigul District and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 04/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NILAKOTTAI DINDIGUL DISTRICT 2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL. 3.THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VILAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DIST.

+1. CC to M/S.V.THIRUMAL Advocate SR.No.27657

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9824 of 2015 Date :04/06/2015 RG.05.06.2015 2P.6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/