Murugesan v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.03.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Murugesan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District, Karur.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Karur District, Karur.

... Respondents (R2 is suo motu impleaded vide order dated 03.03.2023 in W.P.(MD)No.4772 of 2023 by GRSJ) Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A4/285/2020, on the file of the Respondent within time frame that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj For Respondents : Mr.G.Suriyananth, Addl. Government Pleader.

1/4

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation before the impleaded second respondent for correction what according to him is error committed during UDR. The second respondent is directed to dispose of the said representation on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The second respondent shall put the interested persons including, if any, on notice before passing final order. It is open to the second respondent to pass order one way or the other.

3.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. 03.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias 2/4

To:

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District, Karur.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Karur District, Karur.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

ias 03.03.2023 (2/2) 4/4