← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6546/2021dismissed

Jeyanthi.M v. The Director General Of Police

2021-03-24Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh2 pages

W.P.(MD) No.6546 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.03.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.(MD) No.6546 of 2021 and W.M.P.(MD) No.5095 of 2021 M.Jeyanthi

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

... Respondents P RAYER:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in his order (endorsement) in C.No. A3/49201/2019 dated 13.02.2020 and quash the same as non speaking order and consequently direct the respondents to reappoint the petitioner as Women Police Constable under the jurisdiction of the 2nd respondent based on the clarification given in paragraph 12 of the judgment of the Honble Supreme Court of India made in Civil Appeal No.9423of 2019 dated 13.12.2019 within a stipulated period as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthukaruppan Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2.The petitioner's resignation was accepted by the respondents and when the petitioner sought to question the relieving order with a consequential relief for reinstatement, the issue went to the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the proceedings initiated by the respondents, accepting the petitioner's resignation and relieving her, was upheld. Apart from granting liberty to the petitioner by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.9423of 2019, enabling her to participate any selection process for fresh appointment, there is no liberty for seeking re-employment. As such, the petitioner's request for re-employment cannot be sustained. In this background, the rejection of the petitioner's request seen in the impugned order dated 13.02.2020 cannot be found fault with. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD) No.6546 of 2021 3.The Writ Petition stands dismissed accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar () // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

+1 CC to M/s.ANANTH.C.RAJESH, Advocate ( SR-13185[F] dated 24/03/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-13588[F] dated 25/03/2021 ) W.P.(MD) No.6546 of 2021 24.03.2021 SE(CO) KB(19.04.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2