Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/13509/2016disposed of

Vigneshwaran v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-08-02Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.08.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13509 of 2016 1.Vigneshwaran 2.Valarmathi .. Petitioners Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District 2.The Inspector of Police, Koodal Pudur Police Station, Madurai District 3.Karumpachalam .. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners in the name of the enquiry.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vinoth Bharathi For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is a petition seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners in the name of the enquiry.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side).

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, would submit that petition enquiry has been conducted and closed. Therefore, there is no opportunity for the respondents to harass the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District 2.The Inspector of Police, Koodal Pudur Police Station, Madurai District 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.R.Vinoth Barathi, Advocate SR.No.41309 RR sm:DB:11.8.2016:2P/5C Crl.O.P(MD)No.13509 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/