Thangamunichamy v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 23/02/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY 1.Thangamunichamy 2.Renugadevi 3.Sundarraj ... Petitioners/Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

Crime No.16 of 2025. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : C.Suresh Kannan Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-29AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime no.16 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences 1/6

punishable under Sections 498(A), 406, 355, 294(b) & 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.16 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the A1 is the husband of the defacto complainant. The allegation against the accused is that A1 and other accused persons have demanded additional dowry from the defacto complainant and abused her using filthy language and harassed her. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl. side) submitted that these petitioners are in-laws of the defacto complainant. However, he opposed for grant of 2/6

anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and since these petitioners are in-laws of the defacto complainant and considering the nature of offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the other petitioners, subject to certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, Madurai, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and 3/6

the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required;

[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

4/6

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

23.02.2026 PJL TO 1.Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Thirumangalam, Madurai District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J PJL

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.3814 of 2026 Date : 23/02/2026 6/6