G.Rajkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.12.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR CRL.O.P.(MD) No.16504 of 2017 1.G.Rajkumar 2.S.Nagarajan ... Petitioners/ Accused 1 and 2 -Vs1.The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai Town Police Station, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

...1st Respondent / Complainant 2.B.Ravikumar ...2nd Respondent / De-facto complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.448 of 2016 dated 11.06.2016 pending on the file of the first respondent police.

For Petitioners : Ms.Dharani Ramkumar For R1 : Mr.K.S.Duraipandian Additional Public Prosecutor For R2 : Mr.A.S.Vaigunth ***

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.448 of 2016 pending on the file of the first respondent police.

2.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent and the learned Counsel appearing for the second respondent.

3.The petitioners are Accused Nos.1 and 2 in the criminal case in Cr.No.448 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent police. Based on the complaint lodged by the second respondent, a case was registered in Crime No.448 of 2016, as against the petitioners, for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the offences punishable under Section 506(i) IPC. 4.It appears that the parties, namely, the petitioners and the second respondent have settled their dispute amicably out of Court, at the intervention of elders and relatives and a compromise was also reached. A Joint Compromise Memo, signed by both the parties, in the presence of their respective Counsels, is also produced before this Court. As per the Joint Compromise Memo, the second respondent has no objection for quashing the First Information Report in Cr.No.448 of 2016 pending on the file of the first respondent police.

5.Today, the parties appeared before this Court and expressed in unequivocal terms that they have signed the Joint Compromise Memo on their own free will and volition. The identity of the parties are verified with reference to the authenticated documents produced by the parties before this Court. The identity of the parties are also confirmed by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor through the first respondent police.

6.In view of the specific terms of the Joint Compromise Memo, this Court is of the view that no useful or fruitful purpose will be served by keeping this matter pending. Hence the First Information Report in Cr.No.448 of 2016 pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai Town Police Station, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District is quashed in toto. The Joint Compromise Memo signed by the parties shall form part of the order.

7.Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To Encl:Xerox copy of Compromise Memo 1.The Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai Town Police Station, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CMR JS/JC/SAR.4/18.12.2017/2P-3C CRL.O.P.(MD) No.16504 of 2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 04.12.2017