P.Palanisamy, v. The Tahsildar

THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.04.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.4614 of 2019 P.Palanisamy ... Petitioner Vs The Tahsildar Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul.

... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to issue Patta in favour of the petitioner for the property in Survey No.249/1, 249/3, 249/5, 248/4, 246/1A2, 247/1A, 248/6, 248/2, 250/2, 251/1, 249/2, 248/1, 247/1C and 247/2 comprised in Balakrishnapuram Village, Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul District by subdividing the same by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 05.02.2019 within the time frame as may be stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondent : Mr.K.Mu.Muthu Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate produced a communication from the respondent indicating that the petitioner has already been issued with patta. 2.Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) pnn https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The Tahsildar Dindigul East Taluk, Dindigul.

+1CC TO MR.S.C.HEROLD SINGH, Advocate Sr. No.61329 +1CC TO THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.No.61260 W.P.(MD)No.4614 of 2019 NRK(CO) TR (03.05.2019) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/