Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16529/2017dismissed

K. Pandi, S/O. Karuppu Thevar v. The Inspector Of Police,

2017-12-04Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fourth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.16529 of 2017 1 K. PANDI, 2 SUNDARAMMAL, 3 K. PANDISELVI, 4 S. KARUTHAPANDI, 5 S.SURULIAMMAL, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUMANGALAM TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. NONT KNOWN OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.AMJADKHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 332, 333, 334, 352, 353, 354 and 307 of I.P.C. in Crime No.Not Known of 2017, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners/A1 and A2 are serving as a soldier in the Indian Military. The petitioners attacked the Inspector of Police. As a result, he sustained injuries, thereby, the respondent police registered a complaint as against the petitioners.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that the present stage of investigation,

these petitioners are not arrayed as accused in the F.I.R. Hence, the question of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners does not arise.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), the question of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners does not arise. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.

sd/- 04/12/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUMANGALAM TALUK POLICE STATION, TIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16529 of 2017 Date :04/12/2017 SMA/RR/SAR-1/12.12.2017:2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/