Nagarajan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Eighteenth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.16582 of 2017 1 NAGARAJAN 2 MEENAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs THE STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE REDDIYAPATTI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT (CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.C.SURESH KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C, in Crime No.
202 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a civil dispute in respect of the property enjoyed by the defacto complainant. On 26.11.2017, when the defacto complainant doing motor repair works in the well, at that time, the petitioners came and attacked the defacto complainant, thereby the defacto complainant sustained injuries and he was admitted in the hospital through 108 ambulance van. Hence, the defacto complainant filed a complaint before the respondent police. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. In fact, the civil dispute is pending before the Competent Court. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.
side) appearing for the State submitted that the injured was discharged from the hospital.
6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that the injured was discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(i) the first petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and the second petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required;
(ii) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (iii) the petitioner shall make themselves available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the investigation officer; (iv) the petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail;
(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law and the anticipatory bail granted stands cancelled automatically. sd/- 18/12/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
rmi TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,ARUPPUKOTTAI
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE REDDIYAPATTI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.C.SURESH KANNAN Advocate SR.No.36428 GJM/PM/PN/SAR-I-21.12.2017-3P-6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.16582 of 2017 Date :18/12/2017