T.K. Ramdoss v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fifth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.16633 of 2017 1 T.K. RAMDOSS 2 T.R. DURGA DEVI 3 G.K. SARAVANAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 to 3 Vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOUTH GATE POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT CRIME NO.873/2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.R.BABU JAGANATH Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as Accused Nos.1 to 3, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.873 of 2017, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) would submit that the petitioners are not arrayed as accused till date in Crime No.873 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.In view of the above submission made by the learned

Government Advocate (Criminal Side), I am of the view that consideration of the anticipatory bail petition does not arise. Hence, this petition is closed.

sd/- 05/12/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SOUTH GATE POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.R.BABU JAGANATH Advocate SR.No.35600

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16633 of 2017 Date :05/12/2017 PK/RR/SAR-3/11.12.2017 : 2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/