← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/5261/2022disposed of

Sivamani v. The Principal Secretary To The Government

2023-12-14Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.12.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.4282 & 4283 of 2022 Sivamani ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Principal Secretary to the Government State of Tamilnadu, Registration Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028.

3.The Additional Inspector General of Registration (Mu&Pa), Office of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028.

4.The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Pudukottai District.

5.The Sub-Registrar, Karambakudi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

1/4

6.Krishnan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondents 1 to 4 to forbear any further registrations of documents for the property in survey no.239, Sub division number 8, Door No.16A1, 16A2, Bus Stand Back Side, Katcheriveethi, Karampakudi, Pudhukottai District by considering the petitioner's representation dated 27.02.2022, in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.S.Ra.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R5 : Mr.R.Karunanidhi for R6

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2. The writ petitioner is none other than the son of the 6th respondent. The 6th respondent executed the settlement deed in favour of the petitioner on 18.03.2011. Subsequently, the 6th respondent cancelled the same unilaterally. The petitioner has therefore instituted O.S.No.274 of 2018 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pudukkottai seeking the relief of declaration and permanent injunction. In the meanwhile, the 6th respondent should not create any further encumbrances.

2/4

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the 6th respondent submitted that the 6th respondent will contest the suit filed by the petitioner and that till the disposal of the suit, no further alienation or encumbrances will be made.

4. Recording the said undertaking, the Writ Petition is disposed of. I also hope that the outstanding issues between the petitioner and the 6th respondent will be amicably resolved through the process of mediation. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 14.12.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi To 1.The Principal Secretary to the Government State of Tamilnadu, Registration Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Inspector General of Registration, Office of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028.

3.The Additional Inspector General of Registration (Mu&Pa), Office of the Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai-600 028.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

rmi 4.The District Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Pudukottai District.

5.The Sub-Registrar, Karambakudi Taluk, Pudukottai District.

14.12.2023 4/4