← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16793/2017granted

Kanmani, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2017-12-07Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventh day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.16793 of 2017 1 KANMANI, 2 PUSHPAVALLI, ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 & 2 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THUVAKUDI POLICE STATION, THUVAKUDI, TRICHY DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.411 OF 2017. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.KARTHICK SUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as Accused Nos.1 & 2, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b) & 323 of I.P.C. in Crime No.411 of 2017, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are close relatives who is none other than the sister-in-law of he first petitioner.

On 01.12.2017, the petitioners scolded the defacto complainant with filthy language and attacked her with stone, thereby she sustained injury and admitted in the hospital. Hence, she gave a complaint before the respondent police.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State submitted that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate

(Crl.side), that the injured person discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Trichy, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(i) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, as and when required for interrogation;

(ii) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iii)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(iv) the petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail;

(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law and the anticipatory bail granted stands cancelled automatically.

sd/- 07/12/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, TRICHY 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHIRAPALLI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THUVAKUDI POLICE STATION, THUVAKUDI, TRICHY DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.KARTHICK SUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.35979

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.16793 of 2017 Date :07/12/2017 SMA/RR/SAR-3/13.12.2017:2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/