Leo v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of January Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.1398 of 2016 1 LEO 2 RICHARD 3 STELLA MARY 4 RANI 5 SAVARIMUTHU ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 5 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 409 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 5, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 452 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.409 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case and pray for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured person had already been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 27/01/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II DINDIGUL 2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S G.THALAIMUTHARASU Advocate SR.No.4777 akm/28.01.2016/ 2p- 6c/AAL/MPA/AR-I

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.1398 of 2016 Date :27/01/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/