Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/16936/2017closed

Andal Arumugam v. The Inspector Of Police

2017-12-08Honourable Mr Justice S.S. Sundar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.12.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR CRL.OP.(MD).No.16936 of 2017 and CRL.M.P.(MD)No.11143 of 2017 Dr.Andal Arumugam . . Petitioner/7th Accused Vs.

1. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Ramanathapuram. . . 1st Respondent/Complainant

2. Arputhamary . . 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.47 of 2014 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Ramanathapuram, the first respondent herein and to quash the same as against the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Kumar, Senior Counsel, for Mr.S.Ramachandran For R-1 : Mr.K.S.Durai Pandiyan, Additional Public Prosecutor.

***

ORDER

This Criminal Original petition is filed for quashing the First Information Report in Crime No.47 of 2014 on the file of the Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Ramanathapuram, the first respondent herein.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. It is stated that based on the complaint lodged by the second respondent, a case was registered in Crime No.47 of 2014 for the alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 423, 466, 467, 468, 471 r/w 120(b) of I.P.C., as against the petitioner and six others.

4. The petitioner states that she is the seventh accused. It is the case of the petitioner that he entrusted some people for purchase of the lands and that out of 250 Acres acquired from the petitioner's Company, one sale transaction where from it is alleged in the complaint that the second respondent's property was sought to be grabbed by the proposed accused by impersonating the owner. It is further contended that the petitioner being a bonafide purchaser for valuable consideration cannot be roped in.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that the petitioner's name was deleted and that Charge Sheet has been filed as against the four accused who were found to be involved in the commission of offence under Section 420 of I.P.C., based on forged records.

6. Since the name of the petitioner was deleted, the Criminal Original petition is closed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Ramanathapuram.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+ 1 cc TO Mr.S.Ramachandran , Advocate in SR No. 92073 pmu AE/SKN RSK/SAR3/22.12.2017/2P/4C CRL.OP.(MD).No.16936 of 2017 and CRL.M.P.(MD)No.11143 of 2017 08.12.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/