Murugan v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Eighteenth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL OP(MD) No.16964 of 2017 MURUGAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Rank Not Known Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTUR TALUK POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.G.MARIMUTHU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that after conducting enquiry, the petition was closed by the respondent Police and the alleged threat of arrest or harassment is not true.

3.Recording the statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Criminal original petition is closed. sd/- 18/12/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTUR TALUK POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1cc to M/s.M.Jothi Basu, Advocate, Sr.No.36389 JAM/22.12.17/RR/ SAR 3 /1P-4C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16964 of 2017 Date :18/12/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/