Jegadeesh Pandian v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of January Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.1406 of 2016 1 JEGADEESH PANDIAN 2 JOHN PANDIAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1&2 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERAL POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 22 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT FOR PETITIONER : M/S S.R.DURAIRAJ ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused 1 and 2 in Crime No.22 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(ii) IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there was wordy quarrel between the parties and due to that, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant and caused serious life threat to the defacto complainant with dire consequences.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) submitted that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital., this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam, and on their executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 27/01/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

2. DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERAL POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+ 1 CC TO MR.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK, ADVOCATE IN SR NO. 4808

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.1406 of 2016 Date :27/01/2016 CM TE/SK-SKN/SAR-I : 28/01/2016 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/