Shaik Fareeth v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 15/03/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Shaik Fareeth ... Petitioner / Accused No.11 Vs The Inspector of Police, Dhadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District.

(Crime No.224 of 2022.) ... Respondent / Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Raja.Karthikeyan, Advocate For Respondent : T.Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- C-32B. For Bail in Crime No.224 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A11, was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.08.2022.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was arrested on 04.08.2022 for the alleged offence under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b) (ii) (c), 25 of NDPS Act. Based on the confession statement of A.15, he has been implicated as an accused in this case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that there are totally 19 accused and the petitioner is arrayed as A11 and he contact with A.1 on 24 items. The confession statement of the first accused does not reveal about A.11. Therefore, except the phone details, there is no other material to connect A.11 along with A.1.

1/3

4. Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

5.Taking into consideration of the facts and submissions made by the learned counsels and also the period of incarceration, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two blood related sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of learned Principal Special Court EC & NDPS Act Cases, Madurai, and on further conditions that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., and 05.30 p.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 15/03/2023 / TRUE COPY / 17/03/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

NSJ To 1.The Judge, Principal Special Court for EC & NDPS Act Cases, Madurai.

2/3

2.The Inspector of Police, Dhadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Officer Incharge, District Jail, Dindigul District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.RAJA.KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate ( SR-4337[I] dated 16/03/2023 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4411 of 2023 Date :15/03/2023 ED/SBN/SAR- (17/03/2023) 3P 6C 3/3