← Library
Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/916/2018disposed of

Murugesan, v. K.R.S.Ponnuchamy Pandian,

2018-04-23Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.04.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.916 of 2018 Murugesan ... Petitioner/Plaintiff Revision Petitioner Vs.

1.K.R.S.Ponnuchamy Pandian, 2.Muppidathi Ammal 3.Nallakannu (Died) 4.Mariappan (Died) 5.Petchiammal 6.Murugan 7.Muppidathi Sakthi (Minor) Represented by her mother and Guardian R5) 8.Ganesan 9.Mariammal 10.Revathi 11.Iswarya (Minor) 12.Poomari @ Mariammal 13.Kanagarevathi (Minor) 14.Muppidathi @ Iswarya (Minor) (R3, R4 Died, Notice may be dispensed with) (Minors R11, R13, R14 represented by their mother and guardian R12) ... Respondents/Defendants/ Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil to dispose the E.P.No.29 of 2012 in O.S.No.91 of 2008 on the file of the Learned Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil in a time bound manner as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Selvan

O R D E R

The petitioner has filed this Civil Revision Petition to direct the Learned Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil to dispose the E.P.No.29 of 2012 in O.S.No.91 of 2008.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.91 of 2008, before Sub Court, Sankarankovil for specific performance of contract. The said suit was decreed on 28.08.2009. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Execution Petition in E.P.No.29 of 2012 before the Sub Court, Sankarankovil to execute the decree against the respondent. The said E.P.No.29 of 2012 is pending without any progress from the year 2012. In the circumstances, the petitioner has come out with the present Civil Revision Petition for speedy disposal of E.P.No.29 of 2012.

3.I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also perused the entire materials on record. 4.Taking into consideration the material facts and circumstances, this Court is of the view that in the interest of justice, it may be expedient to issue a direction to the learned Sub Court, Sankarankovil.

5.Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the learned Sub Judge, Sankarankovil, is directed to dispose of the E.P.No.29 of 2012 in O.S.No.91 of 2008 as expeditiously as possible, on day-to-day basis, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, No costs. sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar am To The Subordinate Judge, Sankarankovil.

+1CC to Mr.T.Selvan, Advocate Sr.No.62889 GJM/PMI/SAR-I-28.5.18-2p-3c C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.916 of 2018 23.04.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/